Primary Links:

Latest image

Germanna Aerial 1

User login

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 1 guest online.

Recent comments

"Ways of Seeing"

Submitted by Samantha Merz on Wed, 2007-01-17 17:45.

I found it interesting how Berger described the way we see art in relation to our surroundings. We have been taught what to think about certain subjects, bringing those thoughts to mind when viewing an object. Berger used technical terms of viewing art, describing it as "how X had seen Y." I think this is similar to how people view art, in that, we all have our own opinions and ideas. Many explain art as a very personal experience. Here, Berger relates that to how art is viewed from past to present. Art shows history, but the viewer of the present looks at it with the ideas and thoughts of today. This may distort the past issue and meaning. I thought the development of the camera is an interesting way to explain how the value of the original artwork has changed. The original is no longer required. Berger says artwork is "transmittable," that like any other type of information, it can be used or ignored. I like this description because it leaves the interpretation to the viewer, allowing the artist to convey the message, but the viewer to use it as he/she wishes.

Submitted by Samantha Merz on Wed, 2007-01-17 17:45.
Samantha Merz's blog | login to post comments

Jim Groom | Wed, 2007-01-17 23:07

I agree with you that Berger's understanding of art as "transmittable" opens up some extremely interesting and important questions. How does the meaning of an object, in relationship to history, change? How do we look differently at things in different historical periods? As Berger suggests, "The way we see things is affected by what we know or what we believe." What does this mean for us, and the way we look at art, architecture, and historical objects? How do objects mean different things at different times?

You suggest the viewer has a certain amount of control over what he or she wants to see, at the same time, as Berger suggests, we also share certain learnt assumptions about art Particularly the assumption that art is somehow sacred and its aura of mystification often goes unquestioned -why? Finally, what do you think about this quote from the essay, "Today we see the art of the past as nobody saw it before." What does he mean by this?